Abstract- This article presents the performance comparison of 2 types of Bedini SSG free energy generator. The Bedini SSG is a type of magnetic motor generator based on zero point technology created and demonstrated by John Bedini. This device works as its own battery charger.
The study involved the construction and performance of the original Bedini Monopole Energizer 4-pole SSG mechanical oscillator
Bedini SSG Neodymium Magnet. This type of free energy generator can be one of the alternative ways to replace non-renewable energy sources that will run out in the future. In this article, the Battery Coefficient of Performance (COP) for both projects will be identified. Investigation and analysis were done for both types of Bedini SSG. It was found that the replication design could load faster, had less power consumption and its COP improved by 8% compared to the original design.
INTRODUCTION
Free energy generator is a kind of free energy device applied to produce energy without utilizing external resources such as
burning of fossil fuels, namely coal, oil and natural gas(1). Free energy is also used to minimize the cost of energy consumption(2). O
Free energy generator is a decent, powerful and beautiful topology that can bring benefits to human beings. This idea of free energy and
concept came from Nikola Tesla. Nowadays, this energy is being implemented through new research with many scientists and researchers. One of the
The type free energy generator is Bedini SSG.
Simplified Bedini School (SSG) is the most basic version of a patented circuit developed by John Bedini and researched by Dr.
A. Lindemann, based on technology by Nikola Tesla, with subsequent work by Edwin Gray, Thomas H. Moray, and others. This project
is the most basic presentation of the Bedini system. The circuit is powered by a battery as the primary battery to produce mechanical work as
rotate a wheel or rotor and the electricity consumed to rotate a rotor is recycled and captured in another battery. Basically, a feature
of this device based on a very simple design. It is also cheap in terms of construction.
bedeni ssg CONCLUSION
In conclusion, this project is a successful project and fully meets the objective requirement. 4-Pole Neodymium Magnet Succeeded
improve COP by 8%. Furthermore, the replication design could also charge faster than the original design and also had less power consumption.
It can also save 20% on construction cost compared to the original design. Therefore, it can be concluded that the replication design produced
better performance compared to the original design.
