Galvanization vs. painting (a detailed comparison)

Are you looking for galvanizing and painting methods? Galvanizing and painting methods are globally recognized methods of protecting structural steel.

Knowing the advantages and disadvantages of galvanizing versus painting, as well as the applicability of each system, helps to evaluate the suitability of each type.

The most important corrosion protection component in both zinc galvanizing and cast painting is zinc.

The mass of zinc present is the standard method for evaluating the durability of metal coatings, and all international standards use mass per square meter to define coating durability for a wide range of galvanized products.

The amount of zinc in a zinc-rich coating is not clearly defined and the method of specification is misleading. Zinc-rich paint specifications indicate the weight percentage of zinc in the dry film of the paint coating.

An inorganic zinc-rich paint can contain 78% zinc in the dry film, and a high-quality organic (epoxy) zinc-rich paint can contain more than 90% zinc in the dry film. The volume of zinc in a zinc-rich paint is very small because zinc is about seven times denser than the organic binder.

The mass of zinc per square meter is therefore significantly lower than when galvanizing the same thickness.

Testing carried out by the South Australian Road Authority to test the zinc content of various types of zinc-rich paint revealed the following:

In zinc-rich organic paint – 75 micron solvent-based coating – 185 g/m2 Water-based – 250 g/m2 Zinc-rich organic paint – 75 micron solvent-based coating – 185 g/m2 2 A Comparison between hot dip galvanizing and inorganic zinc die casting paint can be made as follows.

Characteristics Hot dip galvanizing Inorganic zinc paint
Application Factory field or factor
Corrosion protection Cathodic and barrier coating barrier
Hardness/abrasion resistance 179 to 250 DPN Varies depending on type
durability 50 years or more 12 -15 years
Cathodic protection Zinc metal is anodic Perhaps; zinc content may be too low for conductivity/bending materials may be non-conductive, minimizing cathodic projection
2,000 hour dive test No corrosion of the base steel The paint absorbed water and corrosion of the lower layer of the steel substrate occurred
Exposure to ultraviolet radiation No impact on performance No serious deterioration
Performance Anger Test -100°C to 350°C Deterioration at 250°C

Source: Internet

Conteúdo Relacionado

Dams are built to retain water or prevent water...
Deep beam sizing according to CIRIA guidelines Are you...
The dynamic enhancement factor is used to improve/increase the...
The tallest dam in the world is the Jinping...
Smart buildings or “smart” buildings are becoming increasingly popular...
As a civil engineer, understanding floor displacement is essential...
The maximum ground acceleration that occurs during an earthquake...
Are you looking for a BS 5400 bridge design?...
Tall building requires a system to absorb lateral loads...
There should be no impulse purchases when it comes...
Air balancing is a fundamental design skill for HVAC...
Beam construction is a broad field that covers a...
One of the first things you need to decide...
This article explains the types of retaining walls and...
The retaining wall is an important structure that provides...
Water bills are not the only operating cost associated...
This article explains the construction of a single angle...
Most of the energy consumed by buildings is in...
Movement joints are widely used in structures because they...
In January, New York energy company Consolidated Edison Inc...
Back to blog

Leave a comment

Please note, comments need to be approved before they are published.